ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2025
Updated imaging markers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: What radiologists need to know.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Cognitive Impairment with Putative Glymphatic-Related Imaging Indices and Cortical Atrophy in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Regional diffusion imaging measures to disentangle SVD-related hypertensive arteriopathy versus cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2026Article
- Multi-omics integration identifies a gut-microbiota-associated plasma metabolite signature for alzheimer disease diagnosis and metabolic pathway targeting.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- Iatrogenic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy After Childhood Brain Surgery: Novel Findings of MRI and CT.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Retinal Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an age-related small vessel disease pathologically characterized by the progressive accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide in cerebrovascular walls, affecting both cortical and leptomeningeal vessels. Amyloid deposition results in fragile vessels, which may lead to lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and cognitive impairment. To evaluate the probability and severity of CAA, the imaging markers depicted on CT and MRI techniques are crucial, as brain pathological examination is highly invasive. Although the Boston criteria have established diagnostic value and have been updated to version 2.0, due to an aging population, the patients with CAA should also be assessed for their risk of future ICH or cognitive impairment. Furthermore, an increased awareness of CAA is essential when introducing anticoagulants for infarct in elderly patients or anti-amyloid antibodies for Alzheimer's disease, as these may worsen CAA-related hemorrhagic lesions. However, the radiological literature on CAA has not been comprehensively updated. Here, we review the imaging markers of CAA and clinical significance. We also discuss the clinical and imaging characteristics of CAA-related inflammation, amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, and iatrogenic-CAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.