SynthesisPituitary2024
The diagnostic value of prolactin adjustment in bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for differentiating Cushing's disease from the ectopic ACTH syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pituitary, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome can arise from a pituitary tumour (Cushing's disease) or an ectopic ACTH-secreting tumour, making precise differentiation essential for effective treatment. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is the gold standard for this differentiation, but false-negative results can limit its accuracy. Adding prolactin (PRL) measurement to BIPSS has been proposed to improve diagnostic precision. This meta-analysis evaluates how correction for prolactin levels ('prolactin adjustment') affects the diagnostic value of BIPSS in distinguishing Cushing's disease from ectopic ACTH syndrome.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to July 2024. Studies were included if they provided data on BIPSS with and without PRL adjustment for ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and diagnostic accuracy metrics were analysed using bivariate generalised linear mixed modelling.
resultsA total of 10 studies with 310 participants were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of BIPSS with PRL adjustment were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-0.98) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52-0.81), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 48.0 (95% CI: 19.0-123.0), with a positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 3.00 (95% CI: 1.9-4.7) and a negative LR of 0.06 (95% CI: 0.03-0.12). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97). For BIPSS without PRL adjustment, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93) and specificity was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85), with a DOR of 27.0 (95% CI: 13.0-59.0). The SROC curve area was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94). Prolactin adjustment improved sensitivity (P < 0.01) without a significant change in specificity (P = 0.13).
conclusionsProlactin adjustment in BIPSS slightly improves sensitivity for diagnosing Cushing's disease but does not enhance specificity for ectopic ACTH syndrome. This highlights the value of PRL measurement in improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing false negatives, while BIPSS remains crucial for ruling out EAS in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39730909What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.