Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730906›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Mathematical analysis of fractional Chlamydia pandemic model.

Zuhur Alqahtani, Areej Almuneef, Mahmoud H DarAssi, Yousef AbuHour, Mo'tassem Al-Arydah, Mohammad A Safi, Bashir Al-Hdaibat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zuhur AlqahtaniDepartment of Mathematical Science, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O.Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. zumalqahtani@pnu.edu.sa.
Areej AlmuneefDepartment of Mathematical Science, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O.Box 84428, 11671, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud H DarAssiDepartment of Basic Sciences, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, P.O.Box 11941, Amman, Jordan. m.assi@psut.edu.jo.
Yousef AbuHourDepartment of Basic Sciences, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, P.O.Box 11941, Amman, Jordan.
Mo'tassem Al-ArydahDepartment of Mathematics, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mohammad A SafiDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The Hashemite University, P.O.Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
Bashir Al-HdaibatDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, The Hashemite University, P.O.Box 330127, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting PNURSP2024R518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we developed a Caputo-Fractional Chlamydia pandemic model to describe the disease's spread. We demonstrated the model's positivity and boundedness, ensuring biological relevance. The existence and uniqueness of the model's solution were established, and we investigated the stability of the α-fractional order model. Our analysis proved that the disease-free equilibrium point is locally asymptotically stable. Additionally, we showed that the model has a single endemic equilibrium point, which is globally asymptotically stable when [Formula: see text] exceeds 1. Using Latin Hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation coefficients (PRCCs), sensitivity analysis identified key parameters influencing [Formula: see text]. Numerical simulations further illustrated the impact of parameter variations on disease dynamics.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsPandemicsChlamydiaComputer SimulationHumansModels, TheoreticalEquiliburiaFractional derivativesSensitivity analysisStability analysis

Identifiers

PMID39730906
PMCPMC11681196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.