Trial reportScientific reports2024
A preliminary study of further attempt at the development, testing and application of an auxiliary equipment for electronic colonoscopy.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal binders improve colonoscopy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with BMI-stratified subgroup analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Optimizing colonoscopy with abdominal compression devices: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is a valuable tool for colorectal cancer screening and health checkups, with increasing utilization annually. Assisted entry is a standard procedure during electronic colonoscopy. In China, most clinically assisted colonoscopy procedures involve a nurse directly applying abdominal pressure to the patient's abdomen. This maneuver provides a fulcrum for the physician performing the procedure, facilitating smoother access to the colon. To reduce labor, optimize resource utilization, and enhance efficiency, this preliminary study aimed to develop and evaluate an adjunctive pressurized removable lap band for colonoscopy. This prospective randomized controlled trial randomized participants into control and experimental groups for observational comparison during follow-up, mitigating retrospective bias. Data were collected from 150 participants in a tertiary hospital endoscopy department between March and September 2023. Participants were evenly divided into groups using a randomized number table. Demographic data, including gender, age, height, weight, and abdominal circumference, were collected to ensure group representativeness and comparability. No significant pre-test differences were found between the groups. The experimental group demonstrated a significant reduction in examination-only insertion time compared to the control group (p < 0.001), median respectively 2.5, 3. Additionally, compared with control group (41.3%), the experimental group (24%) required fewer nurse assistance (p = 0.024). No significant differences were observed in systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes between the groups (p = 0.07, p = 0.43). However, compared with control group (0.89 ± 1.17), the experimental group (2.19 ± 0.94) reported lower pain scores (p < 0.001). Overall, this preliminary study validates the adjunctive pressurized removable lap band as an effective tool for improving colonoscopy efficiency, reducing patient pain, and conserving medical resources.Trial registration: Registration Authority: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). Number: ChiCTR2400082664.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.