ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Human Dignity and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Basis for a Catholic Ethics on AI.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remaining Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Spiritual and Psychiatric Reflections on Magnifica Humanitas.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Human Dignity and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Basis for a Catholic Ethics on AI.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- The Patient Beyond the Dataset: Levinas, Magnifica Humanitas, and the Principle of Non-totalization in AI Healthcare in the Philippines.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Healing the Divide: A Catholic Social Teaching Perspective on Women's Health Care in the Philippines.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- The Catholic Appeal to Health: A Pastoral Analysis on the Catholic Church's View of Health Inequity in Health Outcomes and Diseases in the Philippines.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Conscience, Care, and Code: Moral Theology, AI, and Ethical Decision-Making at the Thresholds of Life.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in public health: a foundational shift or a technocratic distraction?Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has caught the attention of the world as it challenges the status quo on human operations. As AI has dramatically impacted education, healthcare, industry, and economics, a Catholic ethical study of human dignity in the context of AI in healthcare is presented in this article. The debates regarding whether AI will usher well or doom the dignity of humankind are occasioned by increasing developments of technology in patient care and medical decision-making. This paper draws from Catholic ethics, especially the concepts of inherent human dignity, the sanctity of human life, and morality in the medical field. It talks about using AI to upgrade healthcare outcomes without losing the essential humanity of human dignity in medical practice. It also touches on the most likely ethical issues: the morality of AI-related decisions and the depersonalization of health care. Finally, it provides a framework that brings AI development in tandem with a Catholic vision of human dignity and supports a healthcare system that caters to the common good but correctly respects the irreplaceable value of the human person and highlights moral responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39730882What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.