Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730836›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Association between prophylactic aspirin use and hypertension using data from NHANES 2011-2018.

Zhiyi Lu, Qi Zhang, Xinyi Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiyi LuMedical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Qi ZhangChina Resources Wuhan Steel General Hospital, Qingshan District, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 1737876259@qq.com.
Xinyi MeiMedical College, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aspirin may be necessary for some patients with cardiovascular disease, but previous studies on the use and dosage of aspirin and the association with hypertension have been inadequate. The results of existing studies have been somewhat inconsistent. Our study was designed to assess the association between prophylactic aspirin use and hypertension in U.S. adults. This cross-sectional study analyzed a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged 40 and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2018). Aspirin was categorized as no use, low dose (≤ 100 mg), and high dose (> 100 mg). Hypertension was defined as the average of three consecutive blood pressure readings (systolic ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic ≥ 90 mmHg). There were 5297 participants, comprising 52.5% male and 47.4% female. The median age was 64 years (range: 56 to 72) and 3635 individuals were diagnosed with high blood pressure. Among the groups, the incidence of hypertension was 70.2% in the non-aspirin group, 68.3% in the low-dose group, and 68.0% in the high-dose group, with no statistically significant difference observed (p = 0.71). Using a fully adjusted weighted multivariate logistic regression model 4, prophylactic aspirin use was not associated with hypertension [(odds ratio [OR] 1.11; 95% CI (0.89-1.38), (odds ratio [OR] 1.15; 95% CI 0.82-1.61), P = 0.31]. Subgroup analyses, along with sensitivity analyses that excluded patients with diabetes and reclassified aspirin use status, confirmed the findings of the main study. In this nationally representative cohort of U.S. adults, no significant association was found between aspirin use or dosage and the prevalence of hypertension.

Indexed as

AspirinHypertensionNutrition SurveysAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited StatesAspirinAspirinHypertensionPrevalenceRelevancy

Identifiers

PMID39730836
PMCPMC11681006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.