Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730814›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Accuracy of cephalometric landmark and cephalometric analysis from lateral facial photograph by using CNN-based algorithm.

Yui Shimamura, Chie Tachiki, Kaisei Takahashi, Satoru Matsunaga, Takashi Takaki, Masafumi Hagiwara, Yasushi Nishii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yui ShimamuraDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kandamisaki-Cho, Chiyoda- Ku, Tokyo, 101-006, Japan.
Chie TachikiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kandamisaki-Cho, Chiyoda- Ku, Tokyo, 101-006, Japan. tachikichie@tdc.ac.jp.
Kaisei TakahashiDepartment of Information and Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 4-1-1, Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-Ku, Yokohama-Shi, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan.
Satoru MatsunagaOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kandamisaki-Cho, Chiyoda- Ku, Tokyo, 101-006, Japan.
Takashi TakakiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, 2 -9-18, Kandamisaki-Cho, Chiyoda- Ku, Tokyo, 101-006, Japan.
Masafumi HagiwaraDepartment of Information and Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 4-1-1, Hiyoshi, Kouhoku-Ku, Yokohama-Shi, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan.
Yasushi NishiiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, 2-9-18, Kandamisaki-Cho, Chiyoda- Ku, Tokyo, 101-006, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP24K13203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalometric analysis is the primary diagnosis method in orthodontics. In our previous study, the algorithm was developed to estimate cephalometric landmarks from lateral facial photographs of patients with normal occlusion. This study evaluates the estimation accuracy by the algorithm trained on a dataset of 2320 patients with added malocclusion patients and the analysis values. The landmarks were estimated from the input of lateral facial photographs as training data using trained CNN-based algorithms. The success detection rate (SDR) was calculated based on the mean radial error (MRE) of the distance between the estimated and actual coordinates. Furthermore, the estimated landmarks were used to measure angles and distances as a cephalometric analysis. In the skeletal Class II malocclusion, MRE was 0.42 ± 0.15 mm, and in the skeletal Class III malocclusion, MRE was 0.46 ± 0.16 mm. We conducted a cephalometric analysis using the estimated landmarks and examined the differences with actual data. In both groups, no significant differences were observed for any of the data. Our new algorithm for estimating the landmarks from lateral facial photographs of malocclusion patients resulted in an error of less than 0.5 mm; the error in cephalometric analysis was less than 0.5°. Therefore, the algorithm can be clinically valuable.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnatomic LandmarksCephalometryFaceAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMalocclusionPhotographyYoung AdultCephalometric analysisCephalometric landmarksCNN-based algorithmEstimation cephalometric landmarksLateral facial photographMalocclusion data

Identifiers

PMID39730814
PMCPMC11681228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.