ArticleScientific reports2024
Utilizing active learning and attention-CNN to classify vegetation based on UAV multispectral data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of UAV remote sensing for vegetation identification: a review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a deep learning model based on an active learning strategy. The model achieves accurate identification of vegetation types in the study area by utilizing multispectral data obtained from preprocessing of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing equipment. This approach offers advantages such as high data accuracy, mobility, and easy data collection. In active learning, the minimum confidence scoring method and a sampling technique based on a data pool are employed to reduce labeling costs. The deep learning model incorporates a semantic segmentation gated full fusion module that integrates a dual attention mechanism. This module enhances the capture of detailed texture information, optimally allocates spectral weights, and improves the model's ability to distinguish between similar categories. At a labeling cost of 20%, the average accuracy of the model is 93.2%. Compared with other models, the proposed model achieved the highest classification accuracy in the case of limited training samples. At full annotation cost, the average accuracy is 95.32%, with only a difference of about 2%, but saving 80% of annotation cost. Therefore, active learning strategies can filter out high-value samples that are beneficial for model training, greatly reducing the annotation cost of samples Finally, the recognition results of surface vegetation cover types in the study area are presented, and the model's accuracy is verified through field investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.