ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrating EPSOSA-BP neural network algorithm for enhanced accuracy and robustness in optimizing coronary artery disease prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From broad strokes to fine details: qualitative research on the challenges of smart hospitals in Iran.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Risk factor identification mechanism for coronary artery disease based on multiple cross-filtering and binary cuckoo search.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary artery disease represents a formidable health threat to middle-aged and elderly populations worldwide. This research introduces an advanced BP neural network algorithm, EPSOSA-BP, which integrates particle swarm optimization, simulated annealing, and a particle elimination mechanism to elevate the precision of heart disease prediction models. To address prior limitations in feature selection, the study employs single-hot encoding and Principal Component Analysis, thereby enhancing the model's feature learning capability. The proposed method achieved remarkable accuracy rates of 93.22% and 95.20% on the UCI and Kaggle datasets, respectively, underscoring its exceptional performance even with small sample sizes. Ablation experiments further validated the efficacy of the data preprocessing and feature selection techniques employed. Notably, the EPSOSA algorithm surpassed classical optimization algorithms in terms of convergence speed, while also demonstrating improved sensitivity and specificity. This model holds significant potential for facilitating early identification of high-risk patients, which could ultimately save lives and optimize the utilization of medical resources. Despite implementation challenges, including technical integration and data standardization, the algorithm shows promise for use in emergency settings and community health services for regular cardiac risk monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.