ArticleScientific reports2024
CLARE-XR: explainable regression-based classification of chest radiographs with label embeddings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graph guided multiscale cross attention for multilabel chest X ray classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning framework MedFusionNet assists multilabel biomedical risk stratification from imaging and tabular data.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An automatic system for pathology classification in chest X-ray scans needs more than predictive performance, since providing explanations is deemed essential for fostering end-user trust, improving decision-making, and regulatory compliance. CLARE-XR is a novel methodology that, when presented with an X-ray image, identifies the associated pathologies and provides explanations based on the presentation of similar cases. The diagnosis is achieved using a regression model that maps an image into a 2D latent space containing the reference coordinates of all findings. The references are generated once through label embedding, before the regression step, by converting the original binary ground-truth annotations to 2D coordinates. The classification is inferred minding the distance from the coordinates of an inference image to the reference coordinates. Furthermore, as the regressor is trained on a known set of images, the distance from the coordinates of an inference image to the coordinates of the training set images also allows retrieving similar instances, mimicking the common clinical practice of comparing scans to confirm diagnoses. This inherently interpretable framework discloses specific classification rules and visual explanations through automatic image retrieval methods, outperforming the multi-label ResNet50 classification baseline across multiple evaluation settings on the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.