ArticleScientific reports2024
Predictive modelling of hospital-acquired infection in acute ischemic stroke using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A Transformer-based multimodal model for predicting hospital-acquired infections using imaging and clinical laboratory data].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Healthcare-associated infections in Italian long-term care facilities: a machine learning analysis of a 12-month cohort.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Analysis of Systemic Indicators Linking Stroke-Associated Pneumonia, Delayed Cerebral Ischemia, and Outcome After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are serious complication for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), often resulting in poor functional outcomes. However, no existing model can specifically predict HAI in AIS patients. Therefore, we employed the Gradient Boosting matching learning algorithm to establish predictive models for HAI occurrence in AIS patients and poor 30-day functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale > 2) in AIS patients with HAI by analyzing electronic health records from 6560 AIS patients. Model performance was evaluated through internal cross-validation and external validation using an independent cohort of 3521 AIS patients. The established models demonstrated robust predictive performance for HAI in AIS patients, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.857 ± 0.008 during internal validation and 0.825 ± 0.002 during external validation. For AIS patients with HAI, the second model effectively predict poor 30-day functional outcomes, with AUROCs of 0.905 ± 0.009 during internal validation and 0.907 ± 0.002 during external validation. In conclusion, machine learning models effectively identify the HAI occurrence and predict poor 30-day functional outcomes in AIS patients with HAI. Future prospective studies are crucial for validating and refining these models for clinical application, as well as for developing an accessible flowchart or scoring system to enhance clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.