ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024
A hands-free carotid Doppler can identify spontaneous circulation without interrupting cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an animal study.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07729228 (Pulse Detection in Cardiac Arrest Patients Using a Doppler Ultrasound Patch on the Carotid Artery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pulse Detection in Cardiac Arrest Patients Using a Doppler Ultrasound Patch on the Carotid Artery
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of return of spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using continuous carotid artery Doppler blood flow monitored by AI in an animal model.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Realtime detection of spontaneous circulation in humans during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a continuous hands-free carotid Doppler: a pilot study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is challenging. Current methods, which involve intermittent and time-consuming pulse checks, necessitate pauses in chest compressions. This issue is problematic in both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest situations, where resources for identifying circulation during CPR may be limited. The fraction of chest compression plays a pivotal role in improving survival rates. To address this challenge, we evaluated a newly developed hands-free, continuous carotid Doppler system (RescueDoppler), designed to identify spontaneous circulation during chest compressions. In our study, we utilized a porcine model of cardiac arrest to investigate sequences of ventricular fibrillation, followed by defibrillation, and monitoring for the return of spontaneous circulation during chest compressions with the carotid Doppler system. We explored both manual compressions at 100 and 50 compressions per minute and mechanical compressions. To estimate the detection rate (i.e., sensitivity), we employed a logistic mixed model with animal identity as random effect.
resultsOffline analysis of Doppler color M-mode and spectral display successfully identified spontaneous circulation during chest compressions in all compression models. Spontaneous circulation was detected in 51 of 59 sequences, yielding an expected sensitivity of 98% with a 95% confidence interval of 59% to 99%.
conclusionThe RescueDoppler, a continuous hands-free carotid Doppler system, demonstrates an expected sensitivity of 98% for identifying spontaneous circulation during both manual and mechanical chest compressions. Clinical studies are needed to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.