ArticleScientific reports2024
The effect of different immobilization approaches on red-eared sliders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ethical issues surrounding sacrifice methods in animal experimentation have garnered increasing attention, making immobilization and sedation an integral part of the sacrifice process for experimental animals. Currently, internationally recognized general sacrifice methods for commonly used laboratory animals have been established, but there remains significant controversy over the sacrifice methods for turtles. To explore the effectiveness of various immobilization methods and their impact on stress-related indicators in turtles, this study used red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) as subjects. Our findings indicate that - 20 °C cryoimmobilization achieved immobilization after 45 min, with individual deaths occurring after 75 min or more. When the dose of pentobarbital sodium for intraperitoneal/intramuscular injection reaches 0.02 mg/g, an anesthetic effect can be achieved, but exceeding 0.03 mg/g may lead to the death of the individual. While for ether immobilization, 60 min can achieve the anesthetic effect, a duration of over 120 min may cause the risk of hypoxia. With the exception of the ether inhalation immobilization 90min group, the 0.03 mg/g pentobarbital sodium intraperitoneal injection group and - 20 °C cryoimmobilization 45 and 60 min groups, no significant differences in brain, heart, and liver function indicators were observed between the remaining groups and decapitation sacrifice group. The administration of pentobarbital sodium injection for immobilization is relatively simple, with a short induction period, a long immobilization duration, and good anesthetic effects. In summary, pentobarbital sodium injection immobilization is a worth considering method, with an effective injection dose of 0.02 mg/g. Intramuscular injection has a shorter induction period compared to intraperitoneal injection. The research results can provide a reference for the choice of sacrifice methods for turtles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.