ArticleScientific reports2024
The total electric charge and time of application of galvanic currents to macrophages can optimize the release of IL-1β with low cell death.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Short-term efficacy of physical interventions for lateral epicondylitis: a network meta-analysis based on multidimensional evaluation of pain and function.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Percutaneous Electrolysis for Patellar Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Time, Intensity, and Total Dose Parameters on the Ultrasound Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis: An In Vitro Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Electrolysis, Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, and Eccentric Exercise for Shoulder Pain and Functionality in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Exploring Intensity-Dependent Echogenic Response to Percutaneous Electrolysis in Tendon Tissue: A Cadaveric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative Ultrasound Characterization of Intensity-Dependent Changes in Muscle Tissue During Percutaneous Electrolysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Galvanic current has been emerging as a novel therapy to regenerate chronic tissue lesions, including musculoskeletal and dermatological lesions. Recently, the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β release have been identified as a signaling pathway triggered upon galvanic current application. However, the parameters for the clinical application of galvanic current remain subjective to the experience of the facultative in charge. In this study we used an in vitro model of macrophage culture and application of different combinations of the parameters of galvanic current to study IL-1β production and cell death. Increasing electric charge of galvanic current induces the release of IL-1β, but electric charges equal or higher to 144 mC also increase cell death. The release of IL-1β have a substantial variation within different electric charge of galvanic currents, being increased by decreasing the current and increasing the time of current application. Within the range of current intensities studied, the most optimal protocol for maximizing IL-1β release without inducing cell death was identified at electric charges equal to or near 144 mC, applied over a total duration of approximately 25 s. Our findings lay the groundwork for future in vivo studies assessing different electric charge of galvanic current, with the aim of yielding clinically relevant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.