ArticleScientific reports2024
An innovative ear transplantation for vascularized composite allotransplantation research in porcine model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vascularised Composite Allotransplantation: Emerging Applications in Reconstructive Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Porcine xenotransplantation in the clinical era: converging advances and unresolved barriers on the path to clinical translation - a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Systematic review of emerging technologies in vascularized composite allotransplantation.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) represents a clinical challenge for transplant therapy, as it involves different tissues with unique immunogenicity. Even when receiving immunosuppressive therapy, they are more vulnerable to severe hypoxia, microvascular damage, and ultimately the rejection or chronic graft dysfunction after transplantation. This study aimed to develop a surgical protocol for VCA of the ear in a porcine biomodel in the absence of immunosuppression, maintaining the in vitro co-culture of the allograft and assessing their relationship with allograft survival. We employed four crossbred pigs and four outbred mini pig biomodels (Sus scrofa), as donors and recipients, to perform four VCAs. Blood samples were taken from each biomodel for crossmatch testing and SLA haplotype identification. Bone marrow samples were taken from each recipient for subsequent co-culture. In vitro culture and co-culture conditions were maintained and assessed. Histological analysis using hematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on the allograft that lasted the longest time showing the smallest macroscopic signs of rejection. A surgical protocol for Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA) ear transplantation in a porcine biomodel was developed, including the skin. The presence of SLA-DRB1*01:02 and SLA-DRB1*06:01 haplotypes in the recipient and donor, respectively, showed concordance with positive crossmatch tests. In the allograft with the highest survival time, no histological signs of hyperacute rejection were found ten days after transplantation in the anastomosis area. The results obtained from this protocol can provide valuable recommendations for translational applications in face transplantation and regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.