ArticleScientific reports2024
Three-dimensional digital model of the facial nerve assisted in the excision of benign parotid tumors based on 3D-DESS-WE-MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a novel surgical technique for the excision of benign parotid tumors, utilizing a extracapsular dissection guided by a three dimensional digital model of the facial nerve(3DFN-ECD) and compares its clinical efficacy with the extracapsular dissection (ECD) method. This prospective study included 68 patients with benign parotid tumors. The control group (40 patients) received the ECD treatment, while the experimental group (28 patients), underwent the 3DFN-ECD approach proposed in this study. Preoperative three-dimensional double-echo steady-state water excitation sequence (3D-DESS-WE) of MRI was employed to visualize the tumor and facial nerve, and the Mimics software was used to reconstruct a three-dimensional digital model of the facial nerve and parotid tumor. The surgical incision and facial nerve dissection were planned based on the relationship between the tumor and the facial nerve. Postoperative facial nerve function and aesthetic outcomes of the incisions were compared between the two surgical techniques. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complications between the two groups. Postoperative facial nerve function scores in the 3DFN-ECD group were significantly higher than those in the control group at 1 week (p < 0.001) and 4 weeks (p < 0.001). The incidence of temporary facial nerve paralysis was significantly lower in the 3DFN-ECD group (P = 0.036), and the visual analogue scale score for aesthetic outcomes of the surgical incision was significantly improved (p < 0.001). The novel 3DFN-ECD surgical approach proposed in this study significantly reduces the risk of facial nerve injury and improves the aesthetic outcomes of the parotid tumor surgical incision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.