Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730657›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

New autoimmune disorder development after immune reconstitution therapy for multiple sclerosis.

Nataša Giedraitienė, Rasa Kizlaitienė, Gintaras Kaubrys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nataša GiedraitienėClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania. natasa.giedraitiene@gmail.com.
Rasa KizlaitienėClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Gintaras KaubrysClinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) is a relatively new and highly effective treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Uncertainty regarding the development of autoimmune disorders (ADs) after some therapies remains. The aim of this study was to assess new AD development after IRT in MS patients and to describe the nature of those ADs and the time to onset. A total of 179 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (37 after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), 19 after alemtuzumab (ALE) and 123 after cladribine (CLA) treatment) over a ten year period were included in the study. ADs were observed in 6 patients (16.2%) after AHSCT, 8 patients (42.1%) after ALE and 2 patients (1.6%) after CLA treatment. ADs developed earlier after ALE infusions, but later after AHSCT except for cytopenias. Neurologists should be attentive to the development of secondary ADs after ALE and AHSCT in MS patients.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabAutoimmune DiseasesHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationImmune ReconstitutionAdultCladribineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingYoung AdultAlemtuzumabCladribineAlemtuzumabAutoimmune disorderAutologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantationCladribineImmune reconstitution therapyRelapsing multiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39730657
PMCPMC11681027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.