Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730650›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Distributed opinion competition scheme with gradient-based neural network in social networks.

Zhuowen Feng, Yuru Xing, Guancheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhuowen FengCollege of Literature and News Communication, Guangdong Ocean University, ZhanJiang, 524088, China.
Yuru XingCollege of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, ZhanJiang, 524088, China.
Guancheng WangCollege of Electronic and Information Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, ZhanJiang, 524088, China. wanggc@gdou.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of social networks becoming primary platforms for information dissemination and public discourse, understanding how opinions compete and reach consensus has become increasingly vital. This paper introduces a novel distributed competition model designed to elucidate the dynamics of opinion competitive behavior in social networks. The proposed model captures the development mechanism of various opinions, their appeal to individuals, and the impact of the social environment on their evolution. The model reveals that a subset of opinions ultimately prevails and is adopted. Key elements of social networks are quantified as parameters, with parameter variations representing the dynamics of opinions. Furthermore, a modified gradient-based neural network is designed as the evolutional law of the opinion, whose stability and convergence are confirmed by theoretical analysis. Additionally, experiments simulate real-world competitive scenarios, demonstrating practical applications for the model. This model can be widely applied to various filed in social networks, offering a new perspective for understanding and predicting competition phenomenon in complex social systems. Overall, this work provides a structured and systematic approach to understanding opinion dynamics, which greatly enhances our ability to analyze competitive behaviors and anticipate the outcomes of diverse viewpoints in social networks.

Indexed as

Distributed schemek-winners-take-all (k-WTA)Opinion competitionRecurrent neural network (RNN)Social network

Identifiers

PMID39730650
PMCPMC11681056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.