ArticleScientific reports2024
Human motion similarity evaluation based on deep metric learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Similarity Gait Networks with XAI for Parkinson's Disease Classification: A Pilot Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Reinforcement Learning-Based Golf Swing Correction Framework Incorporating Temporal Rhythm and Kinematic Stability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to eliminate the impact of camera viewpoint factors and human skeleton differences on the action similarity evaluation and to address the issue of human action similarity evaluation under different viewpoints, a method based on deep metric learning is proposed in this article. The method trains an automatic encoder-decoder deep neural network model by means of a homemade synthetic dataset, which maps the 2D human skeletal key point sequence samples extracted from motion videos into three potential low-dimensional dense spaces. Action feature vectors independent of camera viewpoint and human skeleton structure are extracted in the low-dimensional dense spaces, and motion similarity metrics are performed based on these features, thereby effectively eliminating the effects of camera viewpoint and human skeleton size differences on motion similarity evaluation. Specifically, when extracting the action information feature vectors using the automatic encoder-decoder network model, a sliding window method is used to divide the key point sequences of each limb part into sequence patches, and the action information feature vectors independent of the camera viewpoint and skeleton structure are extracted in a smaller time unit, so as to obtain a more refined action similarity evaluation result. In addition, the dynamic time warping (DWT) algorithm is exploited to align the sequence of action information feature vectors temporally, which solves the problem of temporal axis discrepancies in realizing similarity metrics based on action information feature vectors. More accurate and reliable human action similarity evaluation results were achieved by the loss function composed of three components, namely, cross-reconstruction loss, reconstruction loss and triplet loss. Finally, the performance of the algorithm is evaluated in a homemade dataset, and the experimental results show that the method could effectively eliminate the influence of the differences in camera viewpoints and human skeleton sizes on the similarity evaluation of actions, and generate more reliable and closer to the human subjective perception of similarity evaluation results for human actions captured from different viewpoints or with varying skeleton sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.