ArticleScientific reports2024
Analysing the support mechanisms of the vaginal ring pessary on supine and upright MRI.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Formulation, development and characterization of fosfomycin tromethamine pessaries for the treatment of vaginal infections.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vaginal pessaries have been used for millennia to alleviate symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Despite their long-standing use, the success rate of pessary treatment is approximately 60%, and the underlying mechanisms of support are not well understood. This study aims to investigate three previously proposed hypotheses regarding the support mechanisms of pessaries, utilizing supine and upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): (1) support by bony structures, (2) support by levator ani muscles (LAM), and (3) the uterus keeping the pessary in place by acting as a lever. Thirty POP patients, with a successful pessary fit for more than 3 months, underwent MRI scans in both upright and supine position. The position of the pelvic bony structures, LAM, uterus, and pessary were analysed by placing corresponding points on these structures and comparing the differences between supine and upright. Also, the angle of the pessary with the horizontal plane of the pelvic inclination corrections system was analysed. Principal component analysis was applied to evaluate how the positions of the LAM and the pessary changed between the two positions. The lowest point of the pessary descends below the lowest point of the bony structures in upright position, disproving the first hypothesis. The pessary significantly descends towards the LAM from supine to upright, but does not drop below it, strengthening the second hypothesis. The pessary angle is below 90° in upright position, the uterus is positioned in the pessary centre and remains constant from supine to upright, strengthening the third hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.