ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of peak particle velocity using hybrid random forest approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Particle peak velocity prediction based on risk-oriented hybrid ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blasting excavation is widely used in mining, tunneling and construction industries, but it leads to produce ground vibration which can seriously damage the urban communities. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is one of main indicators for determining the extent of ground vibration. Owing to the complexity of blasting process, there is controversy over which parameters will be considered as the inputs for empirical equations and machine learning (ML) algorithms. According to current researches, the burden has controversial impact on the blast-induced ground vibration. To judge whether the burden affects blast-induced ground vibration, the data of ground vibration considering burden have been recorded at the Wujiata coal mine. Correlation coefficient is used to analyze the relationship between variables, the correlation between the distance from blasting center to monitored point (R) and peak particle velocity (PPV) is greatest and the value of correlation coefficient is - 0.67. This study firstly summarizes the most common empirical equations, and a new empirical equation is established by dimension analysis. The new equation shows better performance of predicting PPV than most other empirical equations by regression analysis. Secondly, the machine learning is confirmed the applicability of predicting PPV. Based on the performance assessments, regression error characteristic curve and Uncertainty analysis in the first round of predicting PPV, the random forest (RF) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) show better performance than other four machine learning algorithms. Then, in the second round, based on the artithmetic optimization algorithm (AOA), the optimized random forest (AOA-RF) model as the most accurate model compared with the optimized K-Nearest Neighbors (AOA-KNN) presented in the literature. Finally, the points of predicted PPV which have been informed of danger are marked based on Chinese safety regulations for blasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.