ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrated taxonomy to advance species delimitation of the Anopheles maculipennis complex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mapping the Genetic Relatedness of Outdoor-BitingInsects · 2025Article
- Taxonomic signal in the wing cells ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- Anopheline mosquitoes of north-western Russia (Diptera, Culicidae): updated distribution and morphological characters.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Anopheles maculipennis complex consists of several mosquito species, including some primary malaria vectors. Therefore, the presence of a species in a particular area significantly affects public health. In this study, 1252 mosquitoes were collected in northern Italy, representing four identified species of the Anopheles maculipennis complex (Anopheles daciae sp. inq., Anopheles maculipennis s. s., Anopheles atroparvus and Anopheles melanoon). The sequences of two DNA markers, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and nuclear internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), were generated. DNA-based species delimitation analyses were performed, incorporating public sequences, with distance-based and coalescent tree-based methods to confirm the actual species boundaries within the complex. While some morphospecies were unequivocally delimited by all methods and markers, COI analysis splitted An. maculipennis s. s. into two well-supported groups. However, molecular delimitation failed in recognizing An. daciae sp. inq. and An. messeae as two separate evolutionary entities. Species delimitation was further tested with a morphometric approach, which clearly differentiated species collected in the survey area. These findings underscore how challenging the characterization of the taxonomy of the complex is, providing evidence of potential introgression events in An. maculipennis s. s. and suggesting the need for robust evidence to support An. daciae sp. inq. and An. messeae as distinct species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.