ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of the integration of retrieval-augmented generation in large language model for breast cancer nursing care responses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT-4o's and DeepSeek R1's responses to urological problems: a comparative study.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Automated Identification of Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions From Nursing Records Using a Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model Approach: Quantitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- An Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Clinical Nursing: A Scoping Review and Expert Consultation.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Error Detection in Complex Clinical Documentation: Leveraging Large Language Models to Enhance Patient Safety in Oncology.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- TCM-DiffRAG: personalized syndrome differentiation reasoning method for traditional Chinese medicine based on knowledge graph and chain of thought.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enabling Just-in-Time Clinical Oncology Analysis With Large Language Models: Feasibility and Validation Study Using Unstructured Synthetic Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Performance of GPT-4o combined with retrieval-augmented generation on nutritionist licensing exam questions.Endocrine journal · 2025Article
- Improving Large Language Model Applications in the Medical and Nursing Domains With Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated CPT Code Prediction in Endovascular Neurosurgery.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Oncology: Promises, Pitfalls, and Early Applications.AI in precision oncologyArticle
- Article
- Performance and usability of retrieval-augmented large language models for stroke patient and caregiver support.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide. Although large language models (LLMs) can provide breast cancer nursing care consultation, inherent hallucinations can lead to inaccurate responses. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) technology can improve LLM performance, offering a new approach for clinical applications. In the present study, we evaluated the performance of a LLM in breast cancer nursing care using RAG technology. In the control group (GPT-4), questions were answered directly using the GPT-4 model, whereas the experimental group (RAG-GPT) used the GPT-4 model combined with RAG. A knowledge base for breast cancer nursing was created for the RAG-GPT group, and 15 of 200 real-world clinical care questions were answered randomly. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction, and the secondary endpoints were accuracy and empathy. RAG-GPT included a curated knowledge base related to breast cancer nursing care, including textbooks, guidelines, and traditional Chinese therapy. The RAG-GPT group showed significantly higher overall satisfaction than that of the GPT-4 group (8.4 ± 0.84 vs. 5.4 ± 1.27, p < 0.01) as well as an improved accuracy of responses (8.6 ± 0.69 vs. 5.6 ± 0.96, p < 0.01). However, there was no inter-group difference in empathy (8.4 ± 0.85 vs. 7.8 ± 1.22, p > 0.05). Overall, this study revealed that RAG technology could improve LLM performance significantly, likely because of the increased accuracy of the answers without diminishing empathy. These findings provide a theoretical basis for applying RAG technology to LLMs in clinical nursing practice and education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.