ArticleScientific reports2024
Preoperative inflammatory burden index for prognostication in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Predictive Value of the Inflammatory Burden Index for Pathological Complete Response in HER2-Positive and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Analysis with Conventional Inflammatory Indices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter cohort study reveals: composite inflammatory indexs are associated with increased risk of diabetes in patients with hypertension.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Association and Predictive Ability between Inflammatory Burden Index and Fever Following Endobronchial Forceps Biopsy in Lung Cancer Patients.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Whole grains temper immune-mediated inflammation in Chinese esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma survivors: a multicenter questionnaire study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Inflammatory burden Index (IBI) is an effective predictor for a range of malignancies. However, the significance of IBI in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) needs to be further verified. The aim of this study was to verify the predictive power of IBI in ESCC undergoing radical resection.
methodsThe current retrospective study, which comprised 408 ESCC patients randomized into either the primary or validation cohort, evaluated the relationships between IBI, clinical characteristics, and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Additionally, the nomogram model was also constructed and verified.
resultsThe IBI is significantly related to tumor length, vessel invasion, perineural invasion, and TNM stage. Compared to other hematological indices, the decision curve analyses (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) confirmed the higher prognostic value of IBI, indicating the better clinical applicability. In patients with high IBI compared to the low IBI cohort, the 5-year CSS was considerably worse (total: 27.0% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001; primary: 25.0% vs. 58.9%, P < 0.001; validation: 31.7% vs. 59.7%, P = 0.002). The IBI was shown to be an independent parameter by multivariate analyses (primary: HR = 2.352, P < 0.001; validation: HR = 1.683, P = 0.045). Finally, with the C-index of 0.675 (0.656-0.695) in the primary set and 0.662 (0.630-0.694) in the validation set for CSS in ESCC, an IBI-based nomogram was created and validated.
conclusionThe predictive significance of IBI in ESCC patients undergoing radical resection was validated by this investigation. IBI may be utilized for preoperative evaluation of ESCC as it was found to be substantially correlated with prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.