ArticleScientific reports2024
A study on the correlation between MRI-assessed breast volume asymmetry and patient satisfaction after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immediate breast reconstruction provides breast cancer patients with a valuable opportunity to restore breast shape. However, post-reconstruction breast asymmetry remains a common issue that affects patient satisfaction. This study aims to quantify breast asymmetry after surgery using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assess its impact on both breast satisfaction and overall outcome satisfaction, offering scientific evidence to guide improvements in preoperative evaluation. We retrospectively collected MRI images and demographic characteristics from 98 patients who underwent unilateral immediate breast reconstruction. All patients underwent breast MRI scans post-reconstruction, and the MRI images were converted into 3D models using 3D Slicer software. The implant volumes were measured and compared with the actual implant volumes inserted during surgery to assess the accuracy of the MRI measurements. Breast symmetry after surgery was quantified using MRI-measured breast volumes, and patient satisfaction was analyzed through BREAST-Q questionnaires to explore the relationship between breast symmetry, post-reconstruction breast satisfaction, and overall outcome satisfaction. The implant volumes measured in the 3D reconstructed MRI images exhibited high concordance with the volumes recorded during surgery (r = 0.980, p < 0.001). Breast asymmetry values were significantly higher in the high BMI group compared to the low BMI group (P = 0.013), while the asymmetry ratio was significantly lower in the high weight group compared to the low weight group (P = 0.006). The asymmetry ratio showed a weak correlation with breast satisfaction (r = - 0.341, P = 0.002) and outcome satisfaction (r = - 0.371, P = 0.004). When grouped by low asymmetry (asymmetry > 10%), there was no significant difference in breast satisfaction (P = 0.054) or outcome satisfaction scores (P = 0.23) between the groups. However, in cases of high asymmetry (asymmetry ratio > 40%), breast satisfaction (P = 0.003) and outcome satisfaction scores (P = 0.005) were significantly lower in the asymmetry group compared to the symmetry group. Breast volume asymmetry after immediate breast reconstruction is associated with patient satisfaction, with a significant decrease in satisfaction when asymmetry exceeds 40%. This suggests that preoperative evaluation should focus on breast symmetry to improve post-reconstruction patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.