ArticleScientific reports2024
Dosimetric comparison of VMAT plans in preoperative short-course rectal radiotherapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A meta-analysis of dose-volume parameters and treatment efficiency comparing O-ring and C-arm accelerator systems for craniospinal irradiations.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, neoadjuvant short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) has emerged as a valid treatment option for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We assessed SCRT plans using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with Halcyon and Infinity medical linear accelerators (Linacs) and compared the plan quality and delivery efficiency across all cases. Thirty patients who underwent preoperative SCRT for LARC at the hospital were randomly selected. Treatment plans were designed using the Halcyon and Infinity linac platforms, generating Halcyon VMAT plans (Group H) and Infinity VMAT plans (Group I). The target coverage, organ at risk (OAR) dose distribution, number of monitor units, treatment delivery time, and planning complexity of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Plan quality assurance was performed on the ArcCheck phantom. The overall plan quality regarding target volume and OARs was comparable for plans delivered on Halcyon and Infinity Agility machines, with each platform having advantages. Therefore, both radiotherapy platforms are very good options when selecting which technique to use in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.