Fused deposition modeling process parameter optimization on the development of graphene enhanced polyethylene terephthalate glycol.

S Raja, M Jayalakshmi, Maher Ali Rusho, Vinoth Kumar Selvaraj, Jeyanthi Subramanian, Simon Yishak, T Arun Kumar

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

5citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S RajaCentre for Sustainable Materials and Surface Metamorphosis, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, Tamilnadu, India. sraja@citchennai.net.

M JayalakshmiDepartment of Mathematics, School of Advanced Science, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Maher Ali RushoMasters of Engineering in Engineering Management, Lockheed Martin Engineering Management, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80308, USA.

Vinoth Kumar SelvarajSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, Tamilnadu, India.

Jeyanthi SubramanianSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600127, Tamilnadu, India.

Simon YishakCollege of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, Arba Minch University, Sawla Campus, Arba Minch, Ethiopia. simon.yishak@amu.edu.et.

T Arun KumarCentre for Sustainable Materials and Surface Metamorphosis, Chennai Institute of Technology, Chennai, 600069, Tamilnadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the production of graphene-enhanced polyethylene terephthalate glycol (G-PETG) components using fused deposition modeling (FDM) and evaluates their mechanical properties, contributing to the advancement of additive manufacturing. Trials demonstrated notable improvements in mechanical performance, with optimal printing parameters identified using the Spice Logic Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). The effectiveness of this methodology is further compared with the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) combined with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The study revealed significant enhancements, with the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) reaching 69.1 MPa, an average Young's modulus of 735.6 MPa, and an ultimate compressive strength (UCS) of 85.3 MPa. These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing techniques for improving the mechanical performance of G-PETG components, advancing material applications in various industries.

Indexed as

3D printing optimizationAdditive manufacturingGraphene reinforcementIndustrial applicationsMaterials scienceMechanical propertiesPolymer matrix composites

Identifiers

PMID39730500

DOI10.1038/s41598-024-80376-4

PMCPMC11681164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.