ArticleScientific reports2024
Determinants of birth asphyxia in urban south Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birth asphyxia is a well-known cause of neonatal mortality, and the survivors suffer from long-lasting sequels such as seizures, intellectual disabilities, and motor disorders that are great challenges for newborns. Elucidating the determinants of birth asphyxia helps implement evidence-based practice in the local context. Thus, this study aimed at elucidating the determinants of birth asphyxia in urban south Ethiopia. A community-based unmatched nested case-control study was conducted on a cohort of 2548 pregnant women who were followed up until delivery in urban areas of Hadiya Zone, south Ethiopia. All newborns who experienced birth asphyxia (n = 118) were taken as cases. Newborns who were randomly selected from the risk-set (n = 472) were taken as controls (those without birth asphyxia). A binary logistic regression was done using R software. Induction of labor [AOR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.20, 7.42], prolonged labor [AOR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.02, 4.37], delivery through cesarean section [AOR = 3.81, 95% CI: 1.67, 8.72], instrumental delivery [AOR = 3.91, 95% CI: 1.72, 8.89], and low birth weight [AOR = 6.52, 95% CI: 3.40, 12.51] were determinants of birth asphyxia. Asphyxia during birth was mainly related to obstetric care and maternal nutrition, highlighting the need to pay attention during the course of labor and maternal nutrition during pregnancy. This study might have selection bias and loss of power so careful interpretation of the results is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.