ArticleScientific reports2024
A machine learning tool for early identification of celiac disease autoimmunity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Subtle Laboratory and Clinical Precursors of Celiac Disease in Young Adults: A Large-Scale Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Type 1 Diabetes and Other Autoimmune Diseases-Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Screening.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Rethinking Celiac Disease Management: Treatment Approaches Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Toward Precision Medicine in Celiac Disease: Emerging Roles of Multiomics and Artificial Intelligence.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying which patients should undergo serologic screening for celiac disease (CD) may help diagnose patients who otherwise often experience diagnostic delays or remain undiagnosed. Using anonymized outpatient data from the electronic medical records of Maccabi Healthcare Services, we developed and evaluated five machine learning models to classify patients as at-risk for CD autoimmunity prior to first documented diagnosis or positive serum tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA). A train set of highly seropositive (tTG-IgA > 10X ULN) cases (n = 677) with likely CD and controls (n = 176,293) with no evidence of CD autoimmunity was used for model development. Input features included demographic information and commonly available laboratory results. The models were then evaluated for discriminative ability as measured by AUC on a distinct set of highly seropositive cases (n = 153) and controls (n = 41,087). The highest performing model was XGBoost (AUC = 0.86), followed by logistic regression (AUC = 0.85), random forest (AUC = 0.83), multilayer perceptron (AUC = 0.80) and decision tree (AUC = 0.77). Contributing features for the XGBoost model for classifying a patient as at-risk for undiagnosed CD autoimmunity included signs of anemia, transaminitis and decreased high-density lipoprotein. This model's ability to distinguish cases of incident CD autoimmunity from controls shows promise as a potential clinical tool to identify patients with increased risk of having undiagnosed celiac disease in the community, for serologic screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.