Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Extensive methylation analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma of patients with gastric cancer.

Shinnosuke Nagano, Yukinori Kurokawa, Takaomi Hagi, Ryo Yoshioka, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Takuro Saito, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Kota Momose, Kotaro Yamashita, Koji Tanaka and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shinnosuke NaganoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. ykurokawa@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Takaomi HagiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Ryo YoshiokaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takuro SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kazuyoshi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kota MomoseDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kotaro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Koji TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tomoki MakinoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kiyokazu NakajimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

MEXT KAKENHI JP23K08169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is known to be involved in tumor progression. This is the first study to perform an extensive methylation analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) using targeted bisulfite sequencing in gastric cancer (GC) patients to evaluate the usefulness of ctDNA methylation as a new biomarker. Sixteen patients who received chemotherapy for recurrent GC were included. After confirmation of the methylation status of 63 genes using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset, the methylation status in paired tumor and non-tumor tissues and plasma were investigated using targeted bisulfite sequencing in these genes. Forty-four of the 63 genes were significantly hypermethylated in GC patients in the TCGA cohort. Of these 44 genes, hierarchical clustering showed that five (SPG20, FBN1, SDC2, TFPI2, SEPT9) were particularly hypermethylated in tumor compared to non-tumor tissues in our GC cohort. In plasma methylation analysis, patients with high methylation of these genes had significantly worse overall survival than those with low methylation (log-rank P = 0.009). In a patient who underwent blood sampling at multiple points, the methylation levels of these five genes varied closely with clinical tumor status. The plasma ctDNA methylation levels of these five genes could be useful as a noninvasive prognostic biomarker for GC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA MethylationStomach NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkerDNA methylationGastric cancerLiquid biopsyTarget bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID39730450
PMCPMC11680901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.