Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730442›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Association between e-health literacy and perceived importance of future pandemic preparedness in sub-saharan Africa.

Emery Manirambona, Naimah Ebrahim Khan, Oluwabunmi Ogungbe, Sarah Irakoze, Jiaying Li, Emmanuel Uwiringiyimana, Israel Opeyemi Fawole, Cyriaque Habarugira, Oluwadamilare Akingbade, Aimable Nzabonimana and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Emery ManirambonaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. manemery1@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0579-3607
Naimah Ebrahim KhanDepartment of Optometry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-4096
Oluwabunmi OgungbeSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1813-0906
Sarah IrakozeDepartment of Reanimation, Kamenge University Military Hospital, Bujumbura, Burundi.ORCID 0000-0002-5981-125X
Jiaying LiSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-4320
Emmanuel UwiringiyimanaCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0001-5092-6109
Israel Opeyemi FawoleResearch and Statistics, Institute of Nursing Research, Osogbo, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-5507
Cyriaque HabarugiraHakipa Men's Clinic, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Oluwadamilare AkingbadeFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1049-668X
Aimable NzabonimanaCenter for Language Enhancement, College of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Oluwadamilola Agnes FadodunAlberta Health Services, Elk Point, Canada.
Madeleine MukeshimanaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Daniel Yt FongSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7365-9146
Samuel ByiringiroSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9165-0348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmerging and re-emerging infectious diseases continue to pose a severe threat to public health in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and globally. Community-related interventions, such as community e-Health literacy, can contribute to the preparedness to respond effectively to emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases. This study investigated the relationship between e-Health literacy and SSA countries' perceptions of the importance of readiness for potential pandemics.

methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted in sub-Saharan African countries (Nigeria, Rwanda, Burundi, and South Africa) among adults aged 18 years and above between July 2020 and August 2021, respondents were recruited through a non-probability sampling technique. Participants were asked to self-report the perceived importance of 13 items on future pandemic preparedness scored on a 5 Likert-point scale. The four key dimensions of pandemic preparedness were online medical consultation, online courses, messaging for healthcare, and shopping. E-Health literacy was the key exposure. The questionnaire was adapted from a previously validated e-Health literacy scale. Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire online. Data analysis was done using Stata and descriptive statistics including frequency, proportions, means, and standard deviation were used to summarize variables. Inferential statistics including chi-square and logistic regressions were used to test the significance of association between e-health literacy and pandemic preparedness setting the level of significance at 5%.

resultsA total of 1295 people participated in this study. Roughly half of all participants, 685 (52.90%), were aged between 18 and 29 and 685 (52.90%) were females. The standardised average (SE) e-Health literacy score was 29.55 (0.19). Shopping was perceived as the most important dimension of pandemic preparedness across participating countries (mean (SE) of 3.32 (0.06) and above across all countries for online shopping), while online medical consultation was the least perceived as important (mean (SE) of 2.88 (0.08) or less in two countries for instant health advice from chatbot). In the fully adjusted model, e-Health literacy was associated with 8 out of 13 items of the perceived importance of the pandemic preparedness questionnaire. Those include online consultation with doctors (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21), telephone health advice (OR = 1.07, 95%CI 1.00-1.15), medicine delivery (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), getting medicine prescribed in a hospital visit/follow-up in a community pharmacy (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.10), receiving health information via email (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.17) and via social media (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14), online shopping (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.11) and instant streaming courses (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16).

conclusionsThe higher e-Health literacy scores were associated with a higher perception of most elements as important in future pandemic readiness. Strengthening e-Health literacy can be a key element of the preparation for pandemics in SSA countries.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPandemicsAdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemic PreparednessSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineYoung AdultCommunicable diseasesCommunity interventionsCross-sectional studiesDisease outbreak responseE-Health literacyInfection prevention & controlPandemics preparednessSub-saharan AfricaTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39730442
PMCPMC11681008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.