Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730419›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Forage sources in total mixed rations on rumen fermentation, gut fill, and development of the gastrointestinal tract of dairy calves.

A F Toledo, A P Silva, F V L Barbosa, R D F Barboza, I C R Oliveira, E D Marino, D M Polizel, Carla M M Bittar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A F ToledoDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
A P SilvaDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
F V L BarbosaDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
R D F BarbozaDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
I C R OliveiraDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
E D MarinoDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil.
D M PolizelDepartment of Animal Production, College of Technology and Agricultural Sciences, São Paulo State University, Ilha Solteira, SP, 15385-000, Brazil.
Carla M M BittarDepartment of Animal Science, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, n 11, Piracicaba, SP, 1341-900, Brazil. carlabittar@usp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2020/12476-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inclusion of forage sources in calf diets is often discussed, and the main point debated is whether the inclusion level, particle size, source, and how forage is offered may impact gut fill and reduce body weight gain, as well as impact gastrointestinal tract development. This study aimed to determine the effects of feeding forage sources with different qualities on rumen fermentation, gut fill, and development of the gastrointestinal tract of dairy calves. Forty-eight Holstein dairy calves were blocked according to sex and body weight (BW) at 28 days of life and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments. Treatments consisted of a no-forage coarsely ground starter (CON) or total mixed rations containing 7.5% on DM basis of Tifton hay of either medium quality (MH) or low quality (LH) or 10% on DM basis of corn silage (CS). The nutritional content, including crude protein, NDF, lignin, and in vitro digestibility, was used as forage quality criteria. During the first 28 days of life, all calves received 3 L of whole milk twice daily, a commercial pelleted starter ad libitum, and no forage. After that, the solid diet was changed to the respective dietary treatments. Rumen samples were taken to determine rumen pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) proportions. Calves were gradually weaned from 52 to 56 d of age, and 20 calves, 5 per treatment, were harvested two weeks after weaning. The anatomical parts of the gastrointestinal tract were weighed with and without contents, and histological analysis of rumen epithelium was conducted. The CON diet increased total VFA concentration compared to forage diets. The forage diets increased rumen pH, fecal pH, and gut fill. However, regardless of the source, the forage provision did not affect empty body weight. In addition, the forage provision increased the number of papillae in the rumen, but diets did not influence the length and width of papillae. The results suggest that 7.5% of Tifton hay, regardless of the quality, and 10% of corn silage in high-starch mixed diets benefit rumen health and promote greater gut fill without negative effects on final body weight.

Indexed as

Animal FeedFermentationGastrointestinal TractRumenAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietDigestionFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleMaleSilageFatty Acids, VolatileDairy calvesForage sourcesHistologicalRumen fermentationTract filling

Identifiers

PMID39730419
PMCPMC11680764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.