ArticleScientific reports2024
Isolating high-quality RNA for RNA-Seq from 10-year-old blood samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enzyme-enhanced RNA isolation from biofilm-producing bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is much interest in analysing RNA, particularly with RNA Sequencing, across both research and diagnostic domains. However, its inherent instability renders it susceptible to degradation. Given the imperative for RNA integrity in such applications, proper storage and biobanking of blood samples and successful subsequent RNA isolation is essential to guarantee optimal integrity for downstream analyses. Especially for larger collections, it would be particularly beneficial if these methods would additionally offer affordability, minimal blood volume requirements and also long-term storage. In this study, RNA of high quality, suitable for transcriptomics, has been successfully isolated from 400 µL of EDTA and citrated whole blood samples in Boom's lysis buffer stored at -85 °C for 10 years. Isolation was carried out using a modified Zymo Research Quick-RNA kit protocol. This isolation method showed significant improvement in RNA integrity when compared to RNA extracted using the original Boom method. RNA Sequencing provided high-quality data comparable to that of other studies using recently frozen blood in RNA stabilisation tubes. Additionally, sequencing data from blood collected in citrate and EDTA anticoagulants also showed excellent correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.