Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Elevator fault diagnosis based on digital twin and PINNs-e-RGCN.

Qibing Wang, Luqiang Chen, Gang Xiao, Peng Wang, Yuejiang Gu, Jiawei Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qibing WangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Luqiang ChenCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Gang XiaoCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Peng WangShanghai STEP Electric Corporation, Shanghai, 201801, China.
Yuejiang GuGeneral Elevator Co., Ltd, Suzhou, 215234, China.
Jiawei LuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, 310018, China. viivan@cjlu.edu.cn.

Funding

The LingYan Planning Project of Zhejiang Province, China No. 2023C01215The "Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R\&D Program of Zhejiang Province, China No. 2023C01022The Science and Technology Key Research Planning Project of HuZhou city, China NO.2022ZD2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of urbanization has led to a continuous rise in number of elevators. This has led to elevator failures from time to time. At present, although there are some studies on elevator fault diagnosis, they are more or less limited by the lack of data to make the research more superficial. For such complex special equipment as elevator, it is difficult to obtain reliable and sufficient data to train the fault diagnosis model. To address this issue, this paper first establishes a numerical model of vertical vibration for elevators with three degrees of freedom. The obtained motion equations are then used as constraints to acquire simulated vibration data through PINNs. Next, the proposed e-RGCN is employed for elevator fault diagnosis. Finally, experimental validation shows that the fault diagnosis accuracy with the participation of digital twins exceeds 90%, and the accuracy of the proposed model reaches 96.61%, significantly higher than that of other comparative models.

Indexed as

Digital twinElevatorFault diagnosisGCNPINNs

Identifiers

PMID39730406
PMCPMC11680868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.