Observational studyScientific reports2024
Comparative analysis of oral iron therapy regimens in premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Balance and Cardiovascular Health: The Double-Edged Role of Deficiency and Overload.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Review
- Daily versus alternate-day oral iron in women with iron deficiency anemia: impact of dosing schedule and adherence on hemoglobin recovery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Anemia in Women of Reproductive Age: A Retrospective Study Across India.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is prevalent among women of reproductive age. Treatment aims to replenish iron stores and normalize hemoglobin levels, with oral iron therapy being the preferred route in most cases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and side effects of three common oral treatment regimens in premenopausal women with IDA. An observational study was conducted on patients initiated on oral ferrous glycine sulfate therapy (100 mg elemental iron). Patients were divided into three groups based on treatment regimen: alternate-day (n = 40), daily single-dose (n = 41), and daily twice dose (n = 40). Hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels were measured before and after one month of therapy. The primary outcome was to compare laboratory changes from baseline to post-treatment within and between groups. The secondary outcome was to compare the frequency of gastrointestinal side effects. The mean age was 41.2 ± 8 years, with a mean hemoglobin level of 10.4 ± 1.1 g/dl, and a mean ferritin level of 7 ± 3.2 ng/mL at the time of diagnosis. After one month of therapy, hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels significantly increased in all groups (p < 0.001 for all). However, the increase in hemoglobin and ferritin levels was significantly lower in the alternate-day group compared to the other groups (p < 0.001). Gastrointestinal side effects were more prevalent in the daily twice group (66.1%) compared to the alternate-day (16.7%) and daily single-dose (23.4%) groups (p < 0.001). Daily single-dose oral ferrous glycine sulfate therapy emerged as an effective and well-tolerated treatment regimen for premenopausal women with IDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.