Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Exploring spiking neural networks for deep reinforcement learning in robotic tasks.

Luca Zanatta, Francesco Barchi, Simone Manoni, Silvia Tolu, Andrea Bartolini, Andrea Acquaviva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spark: modular spiking neural networks.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luca ZanattaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", Università di Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy. luca.zanatta3@unibo.it.
Francesco BarchiDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", Università di Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Simone ManoniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", Università di Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia ToluDepartment of Electrical and Photonics Engineering Automation and Control, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, 2800, Lyngby-Taarbæk, Denmark.
Andrea BartoliniDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", Università di Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.
Andrea AcquavivaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering "Guglielmo Marconi", Università di Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) stand as the third generation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), mirroring the functionality of the mammalian brain more closely than their predecessors. Their computational units, spiking neurons, characterized by Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs), allow for dynamic system representation, with spikes serving as the medium for asynchronous communication among neurons. Due to their inherent ability to capture input dynamics, SNNs hold great promise for deep networks in Reinforcement Learning (RL) tasks. Deep RL (DRL), and in particular Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) has been proven to be valuable for training robots due to the difficulty in creating comprehensive offline datasets that capture all environmental features. DRL combined with SNNs offers a compelling solution for tasks characterized by temporal complexity. In this work, we study the effectiveness of SNNs on DRL tasks leveraging a novel framework we developed for training SNNs with PPO in the Isaac Gym simulator implemented using the skrl library. Thanks to its significantly faster training speed compared to available SNN DRL tools, the framework allowed us to: (i) Perform an effective exploration of SNN configurations for DRL robotic tasks; (ii) Compare SNNs and ANNs for various network configurations such as the number of layers and neurons. Our work demonstrates that in DRL tasks the optimal SNN topology has a lower number of layers than ANN and we highlight how the state-of-art SNN architectures used in complex RL tasks, such as Ant, SNNs have difficulties fully leveraging deeper layers. Finally, we applied the best topology identified thanks to our Isaac Gym-based framework on Ant-v4 benchmark running on MuJoCo simulator, exhibiting a performance improvement by a factor of 4.4

Identifiers

PMID39730367
PMCPMC11680704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.