ArticleScientific data2024
A dataset of income distribution on provincial, urban, and rural levels for China from 2020 to 2100.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dataset of income distribution on provincial, urban, and rural levels for China from 2020 to 2100.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Projections of future income distributions at subnational levels are becoming increasingly important for a variety of analyses and evaluations. However, relevant datasets are currently limited. This study presents a methodological framework that introduces machine learning algorithms to a top-down approach used for generating income distribution datasets. We project per capita disposable income and income inequality for 31 Chinese provinces from 2020 to 2100, considering different scenarios based on China's local circumstances, and then estimate income distributions based on these. After accounting for necessary consistency between provincial, urban, and rural income datasets, we further generate the same data products at the urban and rural level for each province. We validate our projection results drawing on data from 2007-2023 for China's disposable income, data from 2007 to 2019 for provincial income inequality in China, as well as national income inequality data for the past 20 to 60 years from select developed countries. The proposed methodology provides flexibility to generate similar data products according to a user's specific needs. Our resulting datasets have several potential applications and can serve as inputs for research on drivers and impacts across social, economic, and environmental domains.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.