ArticleGenome research2025
Probing the eukaryotic microbes of ruminants with a deep-learning classifier and comprehensive protein databases.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-resolved multi-omics provide new insights into microbial nitrogen utilization by the rumen microbiota.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Interpreting fungal ecological contributions through taxonomic and functional profiling of metatranscriptomics.IMA fungus · 2026Review
- The crosstalk between host and rumen microbiome in cattle: insights from multi-omics approaches and genome-wide association studies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Applications and advances of multi-omics technologies in gastrointestinal tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomics, particularly genome-resolved metagenomics, have significantly deepened our understanding of microbes, illuminating their taxonomic and functional diversity and roles in ecology, physiology, and evolution. However, eukaryotic populations within various microbiomes, including those in the mammalian gastrointestinal (GI) tract, remain relatively underexplored in metagenomic studies owing to the lack of comprehensive reference genome databases and robust bioinformatic tools. The GI tract of ruminants, particularly the rumen, contains a high eukaryotic biomass but a relatively low diversity of ciliates and fungi, which significantly impacts feed digestion, methane emissions, and rumen microbial ecology. In the present study, we developed GutEuk, a bioinformatics tool that improves upon the currently available Tiara and EukRep in accurately identifying eukaryotic sequences from metagenomes. GutEuk is optimized for high precision across different sequence lengths. It can also distinguish fungal and protozoal sequences, further elucidating their unique ecological, physiological, and nutritional impacts. GutEuk was shown to facilitate comprehensive analyses of protozoa and fungi within more than 1000 rumen metagenomes, revealing a greater genomic diversity among protozoa than previously documented. We further curated several ruminant eukaryotic protein databases, significantly enhancing our ability to distinguish the functional roles of ruminant fungi and protozoa from those of prokaryotes. Overall, the newly developed package GutEuk and its associated databases create new opportunities for the in-depth study of GI tract eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.