Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730186›Full record

ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics

Pitchasak Thongyoo, Jarin Chindaprasirt, Chaiwat Aphivatanasiri, Piyapharom Intarawichian, Waritta Kunprom, Sarinya Kongpetch, Anchalee Techasen, Watcharin Loilome, Nisana Namwat, Attapol Titapun and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pitchasak ThongyooCentre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jarin ChindaprasirtMedical Oncology Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Chaiwat AphivatanasiriDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Piyapharom IntarawichianDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Waritta KunpromDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Sarinya KongpetchDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Anchalee TechasenCentre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Watcharin LoilomeCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Nisana NamwatCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Attapol TitapunCholangiocarcinoma Research Institute, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Apinya JusakulCentre for Research and Development of Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand; apinjus@kku.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy characterized by genomic heterogeneity. KRAS mutations play a significant role in influencing patient prognosis and guiding therapeutic decision-making. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of KRAS mutations in CCA, asses the detection of KRAS G12/G13 mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS G12/G13 mutant allele frequency (MAF) in cfDNA in relation to clinicopathological data and patient survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of 937 CCA patients was performed using data from cBioPortal to examine KRAS mutation profiles and their association with survival. Plasma from 101 CCA patients was analyzed for KRAS G12/G13 mutations in the cfDNA using droplet digital PCR, and the results were compared with tissue-based sequencing from 78 matched samples.

resultsKRAS driver mutations were found in 15.6% of patients, with common variants being G12D (37.0%), G12V (24.0%) and Q61H (8.2%). Patients harboring KRAS mutations exhibited decreased overall and recurrence-free survival. KRAS G12/G13 mutations were detected in 14.9% of cfDNA samples, showing moderate concordance with tissue sequencing, and achieving 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Elevated KRAS G12/G13 MAF in cfDNA, combined with high CA19-9 levels, correlated with poorer survival outcomes.

conclusionThe presence of KRAS mutations was associated with poor survival in CCA, underscoring the importance of KRAS mutations as prognostic markers. The detection of KRAS mutations in cfDNA demonstrated potential as a promising non-invasive alternative for mutation detection and, when combined with CA19-9 levels, may improve prognostic efficacy in CCA.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCholangiocarcinomaMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Cell-free DNAcholangio-carcinomacirculating tumor DNAdigital droplet PCRKRASliquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39730186
PMCPMC11696325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.