ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging KRAS G12D inhibitor in the treatment of digestive system tumors: opportunities and challenges.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancers: A review of current applications.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives of Gut Microbiota, Autophagy, and Apoptosis in Cholangiocarcinoma Pathophysiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Chronic Liver Disease Associated Cholangiocarcinoma: Genomic Insights and Precision Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Evaluation of a 1021-Gene Panel in FFPE and Liquid Biopsy for Analytical and Clinical Use.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Dissecting the METTL3/STC2 axis in colorectal cancer: implications for drug resistance and metastasis.Cell biology and toxicology · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in cholangiocarcinoma: current clinical applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy in biliary tract cancers: early diagnosis, precision therapy, and prognostic evaluation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies Higher DOT1L Expression as a Candidate Biomarker for a Positive Response to Gemcitabine in Cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy characterized by genomic heterogeneity. KRAS mutations play a significant role in influencing patient prognosis and guiding therapeutic decision-making. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and prognostic significance of KRAS mutations in CCA, asses the detection of KRAS G12/G13 mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and evaluate the prognostic value of KRAS G12/G13 mutant allele frequency (MAF) in cfDNA in relation to clinicopathological data and patient survival. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of 937 CCA patients was performed using data from cBioPortal to examine KRAS mutation profiles and their association with survival. Plasma from 101 CCA patients was analyzed for KRAS G12/G13 mutations in the cfDNA using droplet digital PCR, and the results were compared with tissue-based sequencing from 78 matched samples.
resultsKRAS driver mutations were found in 15.6% of patients, with common variants being G12D (37.0%), G12V (24.0%) and Q61H (8.2%). Patients harboring KRAS mutations exhibited decreased overall and recurrence-free survival. KRAS G12/G13 mutations were detected in 14.9% of cfDNA samples, showing moderate concordance with tissue sequencing, and achieving 80% sensitivity and 93% specificity. Elevated KRAS G12/G13 MAF in cfDNA, combined with high CA19-9 levels, correlated with poorer survival outcomes.
conclusionThe presence of KRAS mutations was associated with poor survival in CCA, underscoring the importance of KRAS mutations as prognostic markers. The detection of KRAS mutations in cfDNA demonstrated potential as a promising non-invasive alternative for mutation detection and, when combined with CA19-9 levels, may improve prognostic efficacy in CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.