Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730079›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025

Improving colonoscopy quality in the national VA healthcare system.

Andrew J Gawron, Travis Bailey, Rachel Codden, Jason Dominitz, Samir Gupta, Christian Helfrich, Charles Kahi, Lila Krop, Carmel Malvar, Grace McKee and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04389957 (Improving Colonoscopy Quality for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the National VA Healthcare System), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04389957 completednot on this map

Improving Colonoscopy Quality for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the National VA Healthcare System

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2020 to 2024Enrolled445ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsVeterans Affairs Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (VA-EQuIP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Andrew J GawronVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, United States of America; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Travis BaileyVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, United States of America.
Rachel CoddenUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Jason DominitzVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Samir GuptaVA San Diego, United States of America; University of California, San Diego, United States of America.
Christian HelfrichVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Charles KahiIndiana University School of Medicine, United States of America; Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, United States of America.
Lila KropSan Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Carmel MalvarSan Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Grace McKeeDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco VA Healthcare System, United States of America.
Morgan MillarUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Ashley MogVA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Tiffany Nguyen-VuSan Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
Olga PattersonUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Angela P PressonUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Sameer SainiVA Ann Arbor HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, United States of America; University of Michigan School of Medicine, United States of America.
Mary WhooleySan Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco VA Healthcare System, United States of America.
Yiwen YaoVA Salt Lake City Health Care System, United States of America; University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Susan ZickmundUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States of America.
Tonya KaltenbachSan Francisco VA Medical Center, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; Measurement Science Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, San Francisco VA Healthcare System, United States of America. Electronic address: Tonya.Kaltenbach@ucsf.edu.

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at University of UtahUM1TR004409 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RACHEL HESS, Jennifer Juhl Majersik · 2023 to 2026
$21.9M
Post-polypectomy Surveillance for Reducing Colon Cancer Incidence and MortalityR37CA222866 · NCI · VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FDN/SAN DIEGO · PI GUPTA, SAMIR · 2018 to 2023
$3.3M
HSRD VA I01 HX001574HSRD VA I01 HX003605NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004409NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) prevention is a Veterans Affairs (VA) priority. Colonoscopy quality, especially adenoma detection rate (ADR), is critical for effective screening. Our research indicates considerable variation in ADR among VA providers. Even a slight increase in ADR can reduce fatal CRC rates, and audit and feedback strategies have improved ADR in other settings. A recent report identified deficiencies in VA colonoscopy quality, highlighting the need for standardized documentation and reporting. To address this, we developed the VA Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (VA-EQuIP), which aims to improve colonoscopy quality through benchmarking and collaborative learning, aligning with VA's modernization priorities and HSR&D and QUERI goals of accelerating evidence-based implementation.

methodsWe will conduct a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate whether VA-EQuIP improves provider ADR compared to usual care, the implementation of VA-EQuIP, site-level factors associated with colonoscopy quality improvement, and components of provider behavior change. Using mixed methods our study will measure outcomes like reach, implementation, adoption, maintenance of VA-EQuIP, and provider behavior change. The analysis will include primary and secondary outcomes, such as overall and screening ADR, cecal intubation rate, and bowel preparation quality, using mixed effects generalized linear models and interrupted time-series analyses. Adoption and implementation will be evaluated through usage statistics, surveys, and qualitative interviews to identify factors influencing success. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the impact of VA-EQuIP on colonoscopy quality metrics and factors associated with effective implementation. VA-EQuIP infrastructure allows for national-scale implementation and evaluation of quality reporting with minimal manual labor, guiding future quality improvement efforts to ensure optimal patient care.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerQuality ImprovementBenchmarkingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsAdenoma detection rateColorectal cancerImplementationQuality improvementQuality reportingVeterans affairs

Identifiers

PMID39730079
PMCPMC12376734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.