SynthesisPloS one2024
Postural control patterns in gravid women-A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Exercises Performed with External Focus Instructions on Transversus Abdominis Thickness in Postpartum Women with Diastasis Recti.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Management of Vestibular Disorders During Pregnancy: A Narrative and Evidence-Based Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Balance control and vestibular disorders in pregnant women: A comprehensive review on pathophysiology, clinical features and rational treatment.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostural stability is essential for functional independence in the pregnant population. The contradictions between existing studies and the lack of consistent characteristics in the strategies used by pregnant women for postural control demonstrate the need for further investigation.
objectivesThe aim was to review the available literature on postural strategies throughout pregnancy in both static and dynamic conditions and to provide an assessment of the quality of these studies in terms of methodological issues to identify the reasons for the inconsistencies in findings between research centers.
methodsLiterature searches were conducted using PubMed and EBSCOhost Research Databases. The latest search was performed on September 01, 2024. The review was restricted to longitudinal, cross-sectional, case-control, and descriptive studies focused on the effect of pregnancy on the stability of future mothers, with the following criteria: healthy pregnant women and singleton pregnancies. Trials were excluded if they were restricted to multiple pregnancies or considered various kinds of interventions. The methodological quality was evaluated using the criteria proposed by Downs and Black. Data items such as information on study design, characteristics of the study sample, equipment used, stability task performance, and outcome measures were presented.
resultsThe final analysis comprised 22 articles, including a total of 641 pregnant and 296 nonpregnant women. Research results in both static and dynamic conditions are inconclusive, showing either a decrease, no change, or improvement in postural equilibrium as pregnancy advances. Importantly, the results indicate that women in advanced pregnancy may be at increased risk of falling when their vision is compromised. DISCUSSION: A lack of homogeneity in the study groups and a small number of longitudinal analyses were observed. The methodologies applied and the postural indices used to measure body sway varied across the studies. Our findings can serve as basic data for health promotion programs to encourage safe daily activities in pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.