Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729465›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A novel interpretable deep learning model for diagnosis in emergency department dyspnoea patients based on complete data from an entire health care system.

Ellen T Heyman, Awais Ashfaq, Ulf Ekelund, Mattias Ohlsson, Jonas Björk, Ardavan M Khoshnood, Markus Lingman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ellen T HeymanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Halland Hospital, Region Halland, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1106-1701
Awais AshfaqHalland Hospital, Region Halland, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-0156
Ulf EkelundEmergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mattias OhlssonCenter for Applied Intelligent Systems Research (CAISR), Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
Jonas BjörkDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1883-2000
Ardavan M KhoshnoodEmergency Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-4119
Markus LingmanHalland Hospital, Region Halland, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4068-0341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDyspnoea is one of the emergency department's (ED) most common and deadly chief complaints, but frequently misdiagnosed and mistreated. We aimed to design a diagnostic decision support which classifies dyspnoeic ED visits into acute heart failure (AHF), exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eCOPD), pneumonia and "other diagnoses" by using deep learning and complete, unselected data from an entire regional health care system.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we included all dyspnoeic ED visits of patients ≥ 18 years of age at the two EDs in the region of Halland, Sweden, 07/01/2017-12/31/2019. Data from the complete regional health care system within five years prior to the ED visit were analysed. Gold standard diagnoses were defined as the subsequent in-hospital or ED discharge notes, and a subsample was manually reviewed by emergency medicine experts. A novel deep learning model, the clinical attention-based recurrent encoder network (CareNet), was developed. Cohort performance was compared to a simpler CatBoost model. A list of all variables and their importance for diagnosis was created. For each unique patient visit, the model selected the most important variables, analysed them and presented them to the clinician interpretably by taking event time and clinical context into account. AUROC, sensitivity and specificity were compared.

findingsThe most prevalent diagnoses among the 10,315 dyspnoeic ED visits were AHF (15.5%), eCOPD (14.0%) and pneumonia (13.3%). Median number of unique events, i.e., registered clinical data with time stamps, per ED visit was 1,095 (IQR 459-2,310). CareNet median AUROC was 87.0%, substantially higher than the CatBoost model´s (81.4%). CareNet median sensitivity for AHF, eCOPD, and pneumonia was 74.5%, 92.6%, and 54.1%, respectively, with a specificity set above 75.0, slightly inferior to that of the CatBoost baseline model. The model assembled a list of 1,596 variables by importance for diagnosis, on top were prior diagnoses of heart failure or COPD, daily smoking, atrial fibrillation/flutter, life management difficulties and maternity care. Each patient visit received their own unique attention plot, graphically displaying important clinical events for the diagnosis.

interpretationWe designed a novel interpretable deep learning model for diagnosis in emergency department dyspnoea patients by analysing unselected data from a complete regional health care system.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDyspneaEmergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSweden

Identifiers

PMID39729465
PMCPMC11676563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.