Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729450›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Gendered dimension of chronic pain patients with low and middle income: A text mining analysis.

Ana M Peiró, Patricia Carracedo, Laura Agulló, Sónia F Bernardes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana M PeiróClinical Pharmacology Department, Neuropharmacology applied to Pain (NED), Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2385-3749
Patricia CarracedoDepartment of Applied Statistics and Operational Research, and Quality, Universitat Politècnica de València, Alcoy, Spain.
Laura AgullóClinical Pharmacology Department, Neuropharmacology applied to Pain (NED), Dr. Balmis General University Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8739-0456
Sónia F BernardesIscte-University Institute of Lisbon, Centre for Social Research and Intervention (Cis-Iscte), Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsThis is a mixed-method study using individual interviews (duration between 40-60 minutes) of 181 CNCP patients (71% females) in a tertiary Pain Care Unit, and applying the text mining methodology. Incomes (low or middle) and gender roles (productive vs. reproductive)".

resultsGender differences were identified in the words used to describe pain impact in working and social life, domestic responsibilities, and family relationships. Albeit having similar CNCP severity and interference, women were on average 8 years older, compared to men, with longer referral time from Primary Care, less retired but more homemakers, showing a greater impact on their mental health. The most discriminating word explaining pain impact for CNCP women was "husband", for men was "work", especially among middle income groups. The way men, with a productive gender role, talked about the impact of CNCP in their lives stressed the word "work". In contrast, men with reproductive roles stressed the words "chores, family or limited" as women with low-income did. Only low-income men used the word "help". The text mining analysis indicates a discrepant distribution of men and women into traditional gender social roles that are consistent with stereotypical traits and may have an impact on pain care. There is a need of an intersectional perspective as part of pain assessment, to develop novel self-management interventions for men and women.

Indexed as

Chronic PainData MiningIncomeAdultAgedFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertySex Factors

Identifiers

PMID39729450
PMCPMC11676948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.