ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Detection of Putative Ligand Dissociation Pathways in Proteins Using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Throughput Ligand Dissociation Kinetics Predictions Using Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug efficacy often correlates better with dissociation kinetics than binding affinity alone. To study binding kinetics computationally, it is necessary to identify all of the possible ligand dissociation pathways. The site identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) method involves the precomputation of a set of maps (FragMaps), which describe the free energy landscapes of typical chemical functionalities in and around a target protein or RNA. In the current work, we present and implement a method to use SILCS to identify ligand dissociation pathways, termed "SILCS-Pathway." The A* pathfinding algorithm is utilized to enumerate ligand dissociation pathways between the ligand binding site and the surrounding bulk solvent environment defined on evenly spaced points around the protein based on a Fibonacci lattice. The cost function for the A* algorithm is calculated using the SILCS exclusion maps and the SILCS grid free energy scores, thereby identifying paths that account for local protein flexibility and potential favorable interactions with the ligand. By traversing all evenly distributed bulk solvent points around the protein, we located all possible dissociation pathways and clustered them to identify general ligand unbinding pathways. The procedure is verified by using proteins studied previously with enhanced sampling molecular dynamics (MD) techniques and is shown to be capable of capturing important ligand dissociation routes in a highly computationally efficient manner. The identified pathways will act as the foundation for determining ligand dissociation kinetics using SILCS free energy profiles, which will be described in a subsequent article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.