ReviewChemical reviews2025
Memristive Ion Dynamics to Enable Biorealistic Computing.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusive memristors in the edge of chaos.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Self-Oscillatory Neuron-like Devices for Unconventional Computing Applications.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Printed devices turn neuromorphic.Nature nanotechnology · 2026Article
- In-fibre logic and memory via tuneable passivation-corrosion.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Ions in solution drive action and satisfaction.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Intrinsic nanofilament pathways in molecular crystals enable energy-efficient and reliable memristors.National science review · 2025Article
- Linear and Symmetric Artificial Synapses Driven by Hydrogen Bonding for Accurate and Reliable Neuromorphic Computing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Low Power FANano letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional artificial intelligence (AI) systems are facing bottlenecks due to the fundamental mismatches between AI models, which rely on parallel, in-memory, and dynamic computation, and traditional transistors, which have been designed and optimized for sequential logic operations. This calls for the development of novel computing units beyond transistors. Inspired by the high efficiency and adaptability of biological neural networks, computing systems mimicking the capabilities of biological structures are gaining more attention. Ion-based memristive devices (IMDs), owing to the intrinsic functional similarities to their biological counterparts, hold significant promise for implementing emerging neuromorphic learning and computing algorithms. In this article, we review the fundamental mechanisms of IMDs based on ion drift and diffusion to elucidate the origins of their diverse dynamics. We then examine how these mechanisms operate within different materials to enable IMDs with various types of switching behaviors, leading to a wide range of applications, from emulating biological components to realizing specialized computing requirements. Furthermore, we explore the potential for IMDs to be modified and tuned to achieve customized dynamics, which positions them as one of the most promising hardware candidates for executing bioinspired algorithms with unique specifications. Finally, we identify the challenges currently facing IMDs that hinder their widespread usage and highlight emerging research directions that could significantly benefit from incorporating IMDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.