ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024
Global trends and hotspots in robotic surgery over the past decade: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Technological evolution and research frontiers of robot-assisted ultrasound examination: a bibliometric exploration.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- 10,000 robotic surgeries in Brazil: lessons learned and the path forward.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of research on robot-assisted vascular interventional surgery (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Mapping the global research landscape and knowledge structure of robotic-assisted dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Global research trends and hotspots in robotic-assisted prostate biopsy: a bibliometric analysis from 2008 to 2026.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Miniaturization in robotic surgery: a bibliometric and science mapping analysis of technological evolution and clinical translation (1996-2026).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgical Intensity and Specialization Preferences in Healthcare: An Operation- and Process-Management Perspective Using Bibliometric Analysis, Cognitive Mapping and Analytic Network Process (ANP).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Top 100 most-cited systematic reviews on robotic-assisted orthopaedic surgery: trends, hotspots, and key contributors.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global research landscape of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- An easy alternative technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy with laparoscopic trocar and ultrasound guiding: safety and effectiveness in rural area setting.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- First Experience of Single Port Robotic Areolar (SPRA) Thyroidectomy and Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Analysis of 11 bibliometric publications in the Journal of Robotic Surgery: a few suggestions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Enhancing bibliometric analysis accuracy in robotic surgery: a proposal for search strategy refinement.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The use of laser-assisted cart positioning significantly reduces the docking time of multimodular robotic systems.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Since its introduction, robotic surgery has experienced rapid development and has been extensively implemented across various medical disciplines. It is crucial to comprehend the advancements in research and the evolutionary trajectory of its thematic priorities. This research conducted a bibliometric analysis on the literature pertaining to robotic surgery, spanning the period from 2014 to 2023, sourced from the Web of Science database. The objective was to delineate the publication trends and trace the development of research topics within the domain of robotic surgery. From 2014 to 2023, there has been a consistent upward trend in the annual volume of publications concerning robotic surgery. The United States emerges as the leading country in terms of both the number of publications (n=3402) and citations (n=57731). The Journal of Robotic Surgery has the highest number of publications (n=506), while IEEE Transactions on Robotics has the highest number of citations (n=53). Yonsei University is the institution with the greatest number of publications (n=196), and the University of Washington has the highest average citation count (n=30). Alexandre Mottrie is the author with the most publications and citations (n=70 publications, n=1816 citations). Keyword analysis revealed seven distinct clusters: (1) applications and techniques of robotic surgery; (2) urological surgery and associated complications; (3) gastrointestinal diseases and surgical interventions; (4) robotic thyroid surgery and related complications; (5) gynecological diseases and corresponding surgical procedures; (6) Da Vinci robot and its training; (7) pulmonary diseases and associated surgeries. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been identified as a newly emerging keyword in the field. The corpus of literature on robotic surgery has seen a steady rise over the past decade, marked by extensive collaboration among various countries, institutions, and researchers. This study has delineated the global trends, identified research hotspots, highlighted emerging topics, and outlined the foundational knowledge within the field of robotic surgery. Looking forward, the integration of AI with robotic surgery is poised to offer substantial benefits and is anticipated to become a pivotal trend and area of focus in the field's future advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39729231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.