ArticleMetabolic brain disease2024
Causal relationship between dyslipidemia and diabetic neuropathy: a mendelian randomization study.
Article in Metabolic brain disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some studies have shown an association between dyslipidemia and diabetic neuropathy (DN), but the genetic association has not been clarified. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the genetic causal association between dyslipidemia and DN through a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. Genetic causal associations between total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and DN were investigated by MR to provide a basis for the prevention and treatment of DN. Significant and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified in genome-wide association studies were selected as instrumental variables (IVs) for MR analysis. Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR‒Egger regression, weighted median (WME), simple mode (SM), and weighted mode (WM) methods were used to analyze causal associations. Heterogeneity and multiplicity tests were also performed and analyzed using the leave-one-out method to assess the stability of the results. Genetically predicted TC and DN (OR = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.655⁓0.961, P = 0.019) and LDL and DN (OR = 0.842, 95% CI = 0.711⁓0.998, P = 0.049) may be causally associated, but no causal associations were found between TG and DN (OR = 0.837, 95% CI = 0.631⁓1.111, P = 0.221) or between HDL and DN (OR = 1.192, 95% CI = 0.940⁓1.510, P = 0.149). TC and LDL may have genetic causal associations with DN, though no genetic causal associations were found for TG or HDL with DN. However, this study may have several limitations, and further clinical studies are needed to expand the sample size for future validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39729198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.