SynthesisCardiovascular drugs and therapy2025
Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Versus Warfarin in Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment: A Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of immune dysregulation in aristolochic acid-induced multisystem toxicities: an insight from systems toxicology.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Targeting Vascular Calcification: Novel Insights into Molecular Pathways and Clinical Interventions.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- High Mobility Group Protein B1 Mediates the Role of the Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Progression of Acute Myocardial Infarction.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Clinical Outcomes in De Novo Coronary Lesions After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Integrative Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking-Based Validation of Berberine as a Therapeutic Agent in Arsenic-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis meta-analysis aimed to conduct a systematic evaluation of the comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
methodsA systematic computerized search of databases including PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . was performed to gather research on the efficacy and safety of NOACs versus warfarin in the treatment of DVT, encompassing all records from the inception of each database through September 2024. The discrete data were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the meta-analysis was executed utilizing the Review Manager 5.4.1 and Stata 16 softwares.
resultsA comprehensive analysis of 16 studies encompassing 10,084 patients was conducted, with 6704 individuals in the experimental group receiving NOACs and 3380 in the control group treated with warfarin. The findings are as follows: (1) NOACs demonstrated enhanced treatment efficacy over warfarin, particularly in achieving vascular patency (OR = 1.57, 95% CI (1.09, 2.24), P = 0.01). (2) Regarding the incidence of major bleeding events (OR = 0.65, 95% CI (0.54, 0.78), P < 0.00001), other clinical adverse events-including pulmonary embolism, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction and recurrent thrombosis (OR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.67, 0.88), P = 0.0002), and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) (OR = 0.62, 95% CI (0.47, 0.80), P = 0.0003); NOACs offered improved safety profiles in comparison to warfarin. Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that the preventive efficacy of NOACs against PTS improves with longer follow-up periods (P = 0.02).
conclusionNOACs have demonstrated superior efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of DVT compared to traditional warfarin anticoagulant therapy. CLINICAL
trial registrationThis project did not involve any clinical data collection; the data utilized were derived from articles published in PubMed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39729166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.