Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729113›Full record

SynthesisArchives of toxicology2025

Hepatoprotective effects of phytochemicals and plant extracts against chemotherapy-induced liver damage in animal models: a systematic review.

Jignesh Prajapati, Narendra Bhatt, Rakesh Rawal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Acute and Subacute Oral Toxicity Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Toxicity Profile ofBiochemistry research international · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jignesh PrajapatiDepartment of Biochemistry and Forensic Science, University School of Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, 380009, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8700-9929
Narendra BhattINVENTAYU Private Limited, AIC-LMCP Foundation, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, 380009, Gujarat, India. drnsbhatt@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9226-3251
Rakesh RawalDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Gujarat Biotechnology University, GIFT City, Gandhinagar, 382355, Gujarat, India. rakesh.rawal@gbu.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-1187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy, a cornerstone of cancer treatment, is frequently marred by its hepatotoxic effects, which can significantly impede therapeutic efficacy. This systematic review meticulously evaluates the hepatoprotective properties of phytochemicals and plant extracts against chemotherapy-induced liver damage, primarily in experimental animal models. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, an exhaustive search was conducted across databases like SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science, culminating in the inclusion of 61 pertinent studies. These studies illustrate those natural compounds, spanning a diverse array of phytochemicals and plant extracts that can effectively mitigate biochemical markers of liver damage, enhance antioxidant defences, and modulate inflammatory responses in model organisms subjected to hepatotoxic chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin. Notably, the natural agents reviewed have demonstrated significant reductions in liver enzymes, improved histopathological outcomes, and bolstered cellular antioxidant capacities. The systematic synthesis of data underscores the potential of these natural substances to diminish liver toxicity associated with chemotherapy in preclinical settings. However, the review also highlights critical gaps in research, notably the underreporting of molecular mechanisms and inconsistent data on clinical translatability. To optimize the therapeutic utility of these compounds, future studies should focus on detailed molecular analyses and rigorous clinical trials to validate efficacy and safety, paving the way for integrated approaches in oncological care that minimize hepatic complications.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsProtective AgentsAnimalsAntioxidantsDisease Models, AnimalLiverAntineoplastic AgentsAntioxidantsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsProtective AgentsChemotherapyHepatoprotectiveHepatotoxicityNatural compoundsPhytochemicalsPreclinical models

Identifiers

PMID39729113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.