SynthesisArchives of toxicology2025
Hepatoprotective effects of phytochemicals and plant extracts against chemotherapy-induced liver damage in animal models: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Insights into the Hepatoprotective Effect of Strobilanthes callosa.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Article
- COMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Acute and Subacute Oral Toxicity Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Hydrogen Mitigated Doxorubicin-Induced Liver Injury via Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway Activation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of the effect of Lasianthera africana on Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and other inflammatory markers in inflamed wistar rats.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Article
- Research Progress on the Biological Activities and Clinical Applications of Pseudoprotodioscin.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Toxicity Profile ofBiochemistry research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy, a cornerstone of cancer treatment, is frequently marred by its hepatotoxic effects, which can significantly impede therapeutic efficacy. This systematic review meticulously evaluates the hepatoprotective properties of phytochemicals and plant extracts against chemotherapy-induced liver damage, primarily in experimental animal models. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, an exhaustive search was conducted across databases like SCOPUS, PubMed, and Web of Science, culminating in the inclusion of 61 pertinent studies. These studies illustrate those natural compounds, spanning a diverse array of phytochemicals and plant extracts that can effectively mitigate biochemical markers of liver damage, enhance antioxidant defences, and modulate inflammatory responses in model organisms subjected to hepatotoxic chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin. Notably, the natural agents reviewed have demonstrated significant reductions in liver enzymes, improved histopathological outcomes, and bolstered cellular antioxidant capacities. The systematic synthesis of data underscores the potential of these natural substances to diminish liver toxicity associated with chemotherapy in preclinical settings. However, the review also highlights critical gaps in research, notably the underreporting of molecular mechanisms and inconsistent data on clinical translatability. To optimize the therapeutic utility of these compounds, future studies should focus on detailed molecular analyses and rigorous clinical trials to validate efficacy and safety, paving the way for integrated approaches in oncological care that minimize hepatic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39729113What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.