Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39729108›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Novel isothermal nucleic acid amplification method for detecting malaria parasites.

Lucas Tavares de Queiroz, Barbara de Oliveira Baptista, Rebecca de Abreu-Fernandes, Carolina de Souza Faria Pereira, Juliana Aline de Souza Lemos, Hugo Amorim Dos Santos de Souza, Rodrigo Medeiros Martorano, Evelyn Kety Pratt Riccio, Paulo Renato Rivas Totino, Joseli Oliveira-Ferreira and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rapid and sensitive detection of bovineFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lucas Tavares de QueirozLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Barbara de Oliveira BaptistaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rebecca de Abreu-FernandesLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carolina de Souza Faria PereiraLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliana Aline de Souza LemosLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hugo Amorim Dos Santos de SouzaLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo Medeiros MartoranoLaboratório de Doenças Infecciosas da Amazônia Ocidental, Universidade Federal do Acre, Acre, Brazil.
Evelyn Kety Pratt RiccioLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo Renato Rivas TotinoLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Joseli Oliveira-FerreiraLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, IOC, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Josué da Costa Lima-JuniorLaboratório de Imunoparasitologia, IOC, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cláudio Tadeu Daniel-RibeiroLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Lilian Rose Pratt-RiccioLaboratório de Pesquisa em Malária, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (IOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. riccio@ioc.fiocruz.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4002-5889

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 425.422/2016-0Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/010.001268/2016Fundação Oswaldo Cruz VPPCB-007-FIO-18-2-46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria, a parasitic disease caused by Plasmodium spp. and transmitted by Anopheles mosquitoes, remains a major global health issue, with an estimated 249 million cases and 608,000 deaths in 2022. Rapid and accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for malaria control and elimination. However, limited access to sensitive molecular tests means that microscopic examination and rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) are the most used methods in endemic areas, despite their lower diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, there is a need for developing sensitive, simple, accurate, and rapid diagnostic tools suitable for field conditions. Herein, we aimed to explore the potential of the enzymatic recombinase amplification assay (ERA® Technology) as a remote laboratory test by evaluating and validating the GENEYE® ERA Plasmodium detection kit in Brazilian endemic areas. A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted between June and August of 2023 in the Brazilian Amazon. The study enrolled 323 participants residing in three malaria-affected regions: Cruzeiro do Sul and Mâncio Lima (Acre State) and Guajará (Amazonas State). The participants were tested for malaria by microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT), nested PCR (nPCR), quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and ERA. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were assessed using nPCR as a gold standard. Plasmodium prevalence was 21.7%, 18.8%, 19.2%, 21.7%, and 21.7% by nPCR, microscopy, RDT, qPCR, and ERA respectively. Using nPCR as the standard, qPCR, and ERA showed a sensitivity of 100%. In comparison, microscopy and RDT showed a sensitivity of 87.1% and 88.6%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.56 and 96.93, and kappa values of 0.91 and 0.92, respectively. For Plasmodium falciparum, the sensitivity of qPCR and ERA was 100% while the sensitivity of microscopy and RDT was 96.9% and 93.7%, and the NPV was 99.66 and 99.32, respectively. For Plasmodium vivax, only ERA showed the same sensitivity of nPCR. The sensitivity, NPV, and kappa values were 78.85%, 97.27, and 0.87 for qPCR and microscopy, and 84.21%, 97.94, and 0.9 for RDT. The data presented here show that the GENEYE® ERA Plasmodium detection kit offers a promising alternative to traditional malaria diagnostic methods. Its high sensitivity, specificity, fast processing time, and operational simplicity position it as a valuable point-of-care diagnostic tool, particularly in resource-limited and remote malaria-endemic areas. KEY POINTS: • GENEYE® ERA kit detects Plasmodium in under 25 min, no DNA purification needed. • The kit matches or exceeds the compared methods in sensitivity and specificity. • The kit is suitable for accurate testing in low-infrastructure, point-of-care settings.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityAdolescentAdultBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedBrazilian AmazonIsothermal nucleic acid amplificationMalariaPlasmodium detectionPoint-of-careRapid diagnostic tests

Identifiers

PMID39729108
PMCPMC11680615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.